Cheatham et al v. The R.C.A. Rubber Company of America et al
Edward L. Cheatham, Larry Gist, William Holt and James Teeples |
The R.C.A. Rubber Company of America, The Pulaski Rubber Company, The Pulaski Rubber Company Benefit Plan and Does 1 through 20 |
1:2011cv00006 |
January 27, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Giles |
Todd J. Campbell |
Juliet E. Griffin |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 177 ORDER: The Court will hold a hearing on Monday, September 16, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. to discuss what procedure will be utilized to determine the amount of equitable damages to which the Plaintiff class members are entitled. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/22/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af) |
Filing 127 ORDER: Pretrial Conference is reset for 10/22/2012 at 2:30 PM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/17/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 109 ORDER:Telephone Conference held on 5/31/2012. By 6/6/2012, the parties shall file an agreed order of dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims against defendants Does 1 through 20. Counsel for the parties shall convene another Telephone Conference Cal l with the Court on 6/22/2012 at 11:00 AM, central time, to further address the potential for settlement. Counsel and the Court will use the same call in number previously provided by counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/4/12. (dt) |
Filing 103 ORDER: The bench trial is scheduled for August 14, 2012 with the final pretrial conference scheduled for July 23, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. The deadlines for trial-related matters will be addressed in a subsequent Order closer to the trial date. For the reas ons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court finds that Plaintiffs are entitled to receive retiree health care benefits under the Pulaski Group Insurance Agreement as amended over the years, but that questions of fact exist as to whether D efendant R.C.A. Rubber Company of America is liable for those benefits. (1) Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is hereby GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs seek to establish their entitlement to receive retiree healthcare benefits, but DENI ED insofar as they seek to hold the Rubber Company of America liable for those benefits; (2) The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants the Pulaski Rubber Company and the Pulaski Rubber Company Benefit Plan 70 is hereby DENIED, except to t he extent that Plaintiffs seek to hold Pulaski Rubber Company liable for breach of a fiduciary duty; and (3) The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant R.C.A. Rubber Company of America 72 is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/16/12. (tmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.