Wright v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Wright v. Social Security Administration

Wright v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Brenda C. Wright
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2011cv00039
Filed:	June 2, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Columbia Office
County:	Maury
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge:	Thomas Wiseman
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1383
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2012	Filing 19 ORDER: The Court has read and considered Defendant's Motion For Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), With Remand To Defendant, Document #16, and Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion, Document #17. No obje ctions have been filed by Plaintiff. Defendant's Motion For Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four, 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), With Remand To Defendant, Document #16, is GRANTED, and this case is reversed and remanded for proper application of the Dennard and Drummond Acquiescence Rulings 98-3(6) and 98-4(6); further consideration of Dr. Gale's medical opinion; further evaluation of claimant's alleged mental condition, particularly with respect to the severity of the post-traumatic stress disorder and dependent personality disorder; and to obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony in accordance with Agency policy. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 1/11/12. (afs)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2012

Filing 19 ORDER: The Court has read and considered Defendant's Motion For Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), With Remand To Defendant, Document #16, and Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion, Document #17. No obje ctions have been filed by Plaintiff. Defendant's Motion For Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four, 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), With Remand To Defendant, Document #16, is GRANTED, and this case is reversed and remanded for proper application of the Dennard and Drummond Acquiescence Rulings 98-3(6) and 98-4(6); further consideration of Dr. Gale's medical opinion; further evaluation of claimant's alleged mental condition, particularly with respect to the severity of the post-traumatic stress disorder and dependent personality disorder; and to obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony in accordance with Agency policy. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 1/11/12. (afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda C. Wright
Represented By:	David Arthur Kozlowski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?