Miller v. ALFA Insurance
James Miller |
ALFA Insurance |
ALFA Insurance |
James Miller |
1:2012cv00108 |
September 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Maury |
William J. Haynes |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER granting 45 Motion to Re-Select Independent Engineer. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/24/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 43 ORDER: Based upon a random drawing in open court, Mr. Mattson is designated the agreed engineer. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/18/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 23 ORDER: Before the Court is the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, ALFA Insurance also known as ALFA Alliance Insurance Corporation's motion for entry of default or in the alternative motion to show cause (Docket Entry No. 22 ) to which the Plaintif f/Counter-Defendant James Miller has not responded. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) this motion for default is GRANTED and the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff is AWARDED judgment on its claims against the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant James Miller. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 8/12/13. (la) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.