Wright v. Social Security Administration et al
Jonathan B. Wright |
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification |
1:2013cv00009 |
February 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Hickman |
John S. Bryant |
John T. Nixon |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/31/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) |
Filing 11 ORDER: The plaintiff is directed to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record supported by a brief within 30 days of entry of this order. The defendant shall, within 30 days of service of the plaintiff's brief, file a brief in response. The plaintiff has 20 days after service of the defendant's response to file a reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 5/6/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.