Kuot v. Whithead et al
| Gai Kuot |
| Jason Whithead, Tyler Prater, Ronnie Inman, Cody Rhodes, Jordan Kiddy, Roger West and Mark Hacker |
| 1:2014cv00083 |
| July 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Maury |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 119 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. All other pending motions (Docket Entry No s. 117, 140, 146, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160-61, 164-66, 174, 176-77, 181, 184-85, 188) are DENIED as moot. This is the Final Order in this action. Any appeal of this Order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/25/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
189
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated below, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that: Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 119 ) be GRANTED; this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administra tive remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); acceptance and adoption of this Report and Recommendation (R&R) constitute the FINAL JUDGMENT in this action; any appeal NOT be certified as taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); and all other pending motions (Docs. 140 , 146 , 150 , 152 , 154 , 156 , 158 , 160 , 161 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 174 , 176 , 177 , 181 , 184 , 185 , 188 ) be TERMINATED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/18/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER: After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation 94 is ADOPTED, and Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction 79 , 81 and 83 are DENIED. Plaintiff's fourth motion for preliminary injunction 97 does not present any a dditional information warranting the granting of a preliminary injunction. Thus, Plaintiffs fourth motion for preliminary injunction 97 is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 8/18/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
