Whipple v. Rochelle et al
| Robert Zenas Whipple, III |
| Roger Rochelle, Brandon Iadicicco, Rebecca Millay, Debra Johnson and Josh Paschall |
| 1:2015cv00040 |
| April 23, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Wayne |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
260
ORDER: Whipple's Motion to Ascertain Status 256 of his motion filed at 251 is DENIED AS MOOT. Whipple's "Motion to Reconsider Denial of Relief from Interference with Access to Court or To Certify the Interlocutory order at 255 a s Eligible for Immediate Appellate Review and Abeyance while Review Pending" 258 is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recomm endation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation 245 is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Whipple's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 158 is DENIED and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 201 is GRANTE D. Whipple's remaining motions (Doc. Nos. 249 , 252 , 254 ) are also DENIED. For the reasons stated above, this action is DISMISSED. Whipple previously filed a Notice of Appeal 259 of the Court's September 12 Order. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Procedure 58, and forward a copy of this Order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/29/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. 6CCA via CM/ECF) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
174
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In light of the response by Defendants, the issue raised by Plaintiff in his motion has been resolved, and Plaintiff has effectively obtained the relief he seeks. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunctio n (Docket Entry No. 136) should be DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/4/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 47) is GRANTED as to Defendant Debra Johnson, but is DENIED as to Defendants Roger Rochel le, Brandon Iadicicco, Rebecca Millay and Josh Paschall. The claims against Defendant Debra Johnson are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 12/21/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
