Williams v. State of Tennessee Dept. Corr. CCA. et al
| Robert Anthony Williams |
| State of Tennessee Dept. Corr. CCA., Mark Bannsen, Denise Robinson, Board of Parole, Helen Ford, Arkansas Dept. Corr./SWACC, Warden Devers, Unit Mgr. Buttrum and Doe Employees of Records & Sentence Mgmt Service |
| 1:2015cv00048 |
| June 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER: Accordingly, Petitioner's "Motion for Pauper Status on Appeal" (Docket Entry No. 49) is DENIED without prejudice and Petitioner's "Motion for Pauper Status" (Docket Entry No. 48) and motion for subpoena of reco rds (Docket Entry No. 51) are DENIED as moot. Petitioner may file his motion for in forma pauperis status in the Sixth Circuit under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). The Clerk is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this Order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/11/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail & 6CCA by email)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 2/29/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (afs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
