Hobbs v. City of Hohenwald, Tennessee et al
William T. Hobbs |
Hohenwald, Tennessee, City of, Shannon Banks, Sam Livingston, Kevin Carroll, Robert Fransen, Regina Hobbs and Kylie Barber |
1:2015cv00052 |
June 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Davidson |
E. Clifton Knowles |
William J. Haynes |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER: After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Defendant Regina Hobbs's motion to dismiss 23 is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 11/4/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 58 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that the instant Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 23 ) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/2/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that the instant Motion (Docket No. 26 ) be GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kylie Barber be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 9/1/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (afs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.