Allen v. Helton et al
Mark Allen |
Martha Ayers and Teresa Mattox |
1:2016cv00011 |
February 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Davidson |
E. Clifton Knowles |
Kevin H. Sharp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER: Without Plaintiff first properly filing a motion to pursue his appeal in forma pauperis and obtaining pauper status, he cannot rely on the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), which would allow him to pay the appellate filing fee over t ime. Moreover, his appeal cannot move forward unless and until he pays the appellate filing fee or obtains pauper status. Consequently, Plaintiff must, on or before October 13, 2017, submit the $505.00 filing fee or file a motion to pursue hi s appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is again notified that if he fails to comply with this order, the Court of Appeals may dismiss his appeal for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide notice of this Order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/19/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (6CCA via ecf.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/9/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.