Lowe-Kelley v. Ford
Petitioner: Charles E. Lowe-Kelley
Respondent: Tammy Ford
Case Number: 1:2016cv00082
Filed: October 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Columbia Office
County: Maury
Presiding Judge: William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER: Petitioner's Unopposed Motion For Extension to File Amended Petition (Doc. No. 38 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file an amended petition on or before October 2, 2017. On or before November 1, 2017, Respondent shall file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the amended petition in conformance with Rule 5, Rules § 2254 Cases. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/18/2017. (ab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lowe-Kelley v. Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles E. Lowe-Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tammy Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?