Robinson v. Brantley et al
| Michael D. Robinson |
| Sean Brantley, Kelly Garska, Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood and Jason Woodall |
| 1:2016cv00095 |
| October 31, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Wayne |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER: The Court having been advised that this action has been settled, the action is dismissed without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within forty-five (45) days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. Within this forty-five day period, the parties may submit a proposed agreed order of compromise and dismissal. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/30/19. (dt)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Defendants' objections (Doc. No. 68 ) are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 67 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 48 and 64 ) is DENIED. Defendant' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 49 ) is GRANTED as to Defendant Garska, but DENIED as to Defendant Brantley. Defendant Garska is DISMISSED from this action and the case will proceed to trial against Defendant Brantley. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/14/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 14 .) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and c onducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as modified. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Relief Hearing (Doc. No. 10 ), construed only as a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order because it was filed without service to Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b), is DENIED. The denial is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion for a preliminary injunction after he serves Defendants, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/21/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 12/19/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
