Harlan v. Bolton et al
| Justin Rashad Harlan |
| Nathan Bolton, City of Mt. Pleasant, TN, Leigh Anne Pickup, Stephen Barr, Amit Choksi, Bradley Rodgers and Maury Regional Medical Center |
| 1:2017cv00028 |
| March 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Maury |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. For the reasons explained more fully in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the Court finds that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can b e granted as to the Mt. Pleasant Police Department. That claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is instructed to send the Plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for the remaining Defendants. The Plaintiff will c omplete the service packets and return them to the Clerk's Office within twenty-one (21) days of the date of receipt of this Order. Upon return of the service packets, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE to the remaining Defendants. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/17/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail with service packet for 7 defendants and order only by certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
