Mauldin v. Boyd et al
| 1:2017cv00033 |
| April 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Maury |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: Transferring this matter to the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division; removing this matter from the Court's docket; directing the Clerk to mail to Petitioner a blank Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 and a Form Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Authorization to Release Institutional Account Information and to Pay Filing Fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 4/3/2017. (cc: Petition (with Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241); blank IFP Application, and Authorization to Release Institution Acct. Info. and to Pay Filing Fee); Clerk, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee) (slr)[Transferred from West Virginia Southern on 4/4/2017.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mauldin v. Boyd et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
