Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Ashmore v. Social Security Administration

Ashmore v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Kevin Ashmore
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2017cv00100
Filed:	November 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Columbia Office
County:	Lawrence
Presiding Judge:	Jeffery S. Frensley
Presiding Judge:	Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2019	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: Having conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's determinations and the Commissioner's objections, for the reasons stated herein, the Court concludes that the Commissioner's objections are without merit, and the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Based on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 20 ) is GRANTED and this case is REMANDED for action consistent with this decision. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/14/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
June 12, 2018	Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's "Motion for Judgment Based On The Administrative Record" 20 be GRANTED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be REMANDED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 6/12/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 14, 2019

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: Having conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's determinations and the Commissioner's objections, for the reasons stated herein, the Court concludes that the Commissioner's objections are without merit, and the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Based on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 20 ) is GRANTED and this case is REMANDED for action consistent with this decision. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/14/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)

June 12, 2018

Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's "Motion for Judgment Based On The Administrative Record" 20 be GRANTED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be REMANDED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 6/12/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ashmore v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Ashmore
Represented By:	Hudson Taylor Ellis
Represented By:	Meredith Marcus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?