Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
| William Walker |
| Tennessee Department of Corrections and Tennessee Board of Parole |
| 1:2017cv00111 |
| December 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Maury |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: William Walker, an inmate at the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center in Hartsville, Tennessee, has filed a pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for the writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. No. 1 .) Respondents have filed th eir answer to the petition, asserting grounds for its dismissal. (Doc. No. 10 .) Petition has filed a reply to Respondents' answer. (Doc. No. 12 .) Because the in custody question must in this case be answered in the negative, the Court l acks jurisdiction to consider the claims of this habeas petition. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1 ) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED. This Order constitutes the final judgment in this action pur suant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/3/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
