Mayes v. Perry et al
| Stephen R. Mayes |
| John Doe Brown, Grady Perry and Joseph Adam Brown |
| 1:2019cv00061 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE Cert of Service filed by Grady Perry. (Catalano, James) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 11/4/2019. Discovery due by 12/6/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 9/11/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (jm)
|
| Set Hearing: Evidentiary Hearing set for 2/11/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (jm) Modified on 9/12/2019 (jm). |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#7 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, Certificates of Service shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel did not sign the certificate of service. Please FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document. (jm) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE Certificate of Service filed by John Doe Brown re #6 Answer to Complaint filed by John Doe Brown. (Catalano, James) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re DE#6 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, Certificates of Service shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel did not include a certificate of service. Please FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document. (jm) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for James P. Catalano. (jm) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by John Doe Brown.(Catalano, James) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to John Doe Brown. (Forwarded to USM for service.) (jm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Because Plaintiff's IFP application establishes that he lacks sufficient funds to pre-pay the filing fee, his application (Doc. No. #2 ) is GRANTED. However, under Section 1915(b), Plaintiff nonetheless remains responsible for paying the full filing fee. Stephen R. Mayes is hereby ASSESSED a $350 filing fee. Defendant Perry is DISMISSED from this action. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to ISSUE PROCESS to Defendant Brown at the address provided in the complaint. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/23/2019. (xc:Pro se party and the Warden of the South Central Correctional Facility by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
| (Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Stephen R. Mayes. (afs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe Brown, Grady Perry, filed by Stephen R. Mayes. (afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
