Roach v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
| Douglas Roberts Roach |
| Southern Health Partners, Maury County Sheriffs Department Jail, Kellwell Food Management, Bucky Rowland, Tennessee Department of Corrections and f/n/u Jackson |
| 1:2020cv00029 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT #34675058948 in the amount of $400.00 posted by Douglas Roberts Roach re #1 Complaint. (am) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am) |
| Filing 2 Summons issued as to f/n/u Jackson, Kellwell Food Management, Maury County Sheriffs Department Jail, Bucky Rowland, Southern Health Partners, Tennessee Department of Corrections. (Service packets sent to pro se party by regular mail.) (am) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against f/n/u Jackson, Kellwell Food Management, Maury County Sheriffs Department Jail, Bucky Rowland, Southern Health Partners, Tennessee Department of Corrections, filed by Douglas Roberts Roach.(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
