Lassiter v. Puckett et al
| Lucas Steven Lassiter |
| Suzie McGowan and Amy C. Puckett |
| 1:2020cv00071 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 USCA Case Number 20-6431. Case Manager Jill E. Colyer.(hb) |
Filing 11
ORDER: On November 18, 2020, the Court dismissed this action upon initial review of the Complaint. #4 and #5 . On December 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal #9 and application for leave to proceed on appeal as a pauper #10 . The Court previously concluded that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and declined permission for Plaintiff to appeal as a pauper. (See Doc. No. 5 at 1-2). Accordingly, Plaintiff's application #10 is DENIED on that basis. Plaintiff may still apply for pauper status directly with the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Clerk SHALL provide a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail and emailed to Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.) Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/22/2020. (kc) Modified on 12/22/2020 (kc). Modified on 12/22/2020 (kc).
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lucas Steven Lassiter. (kc) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order Dismissing Case, by Lucas Steven Lassiter. Filing fee ($505) due. (kc) Modified on 12/28/2020 (kc). |
| Filing 8 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #5 Order Dismissing Case, #6 Entry of Judgment, and #4 Memorandum Opinion of the Court. (kc) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #4 Memorandum Opinion of the Court, #5 Order Dismissing Case, and #6 Entry of Judgment. (ln) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT re: #5 Order Dismissing Case. (xc:Pro se party by certified mail. ) (kc) Modified on 11/20/2020 (kc). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Because Lassiter's application to proceed as a pauper (Doc. No. 2) reflects that he lacks sufficient financial resources to pay the full filing fee in advance without undue hardship, it is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against Judge Puckett and Suzie McGowan based on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims challenging the substance of the Ex Parte Order are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Complaint is DISMISSED. This is the final Order denying all relief in this case. The Clerk SHALL enter judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b). Because an appeal would not be taken in good faith, Lassiter is not certified to appeal the judgment in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 11/18/2020. (xc:Pro se party by certified mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 11/18/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Suzie McGowan and Amy C. Puckett, filed by Lucas Steven Lassiter. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
