Jones v. Harold
| Paul Eugene Jones |
| Bill Harold |
| 1:2020cv00073 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: In light of the Court's explicit warning to Plaintiff that failure to show cause or to keep the Court apprised of his current address would likely result in this actions dismissal (Doc. No. 4 at 2), and pursuant to the Court's well settled... authority to dismiss sua sponte a lawsuit for failure to prosecute, Carpenter v. City of Flint, 723 F.3d 700, 704 (6th Cir. 2013), this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's ability to pursue appropriate relief in habeas corpus. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 1/5/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 6 Regular Mail Returned to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. Docket sheet and filing forms returned. Mail sent to Paul Eugene Jones (am) |
| Filing 5 Regular Mail Returned to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. #4 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mail sent to Paul Eugene Jones. (am) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 DAYS of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff MUST SHOW CAUSE why the Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice to his ability to pursue relief in habeas corpus. Plaintiff' response to this Order must include the docket number assigned to this case, No. 1:20-cv-00073. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this Order (or seek an extension of time within which to do so) within the time frame specified, or failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address, will likely result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 11/23/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Notice mailed to pro se parties regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (am) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Paul Eugene Jones. (am) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bill Harold, filed by Paul Eugene Jones.(am) Modified Date on 11/18/2020 (am). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Harold | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Eugene Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bill Harold | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
