Wright v. Giles County Board of Education
| Phillip Wright |
| Giles County Board of Education |
| 1:2021cv00008 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - Joint filed by Phillip Wright. (Collins, Heather) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone in lieu of appearance is set for 5/3/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. All parties dial 1-877-402-9753 access code 3808663#. Jeanne W. Cox, Deputy Clerk. (mg) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Giles County Board of Education.(Saulters, Donald) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Donald A. Saulters admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald A. Saulters on behalf of Giles County Board of Education (Saulters, Donald) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Phillip Wright. Giles County Board of Education served on 3/12/2021. (Hunter, Anne) |
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/3/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Giles County Board of Education. (Service copies sent to counsel by regular mail.) (jm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/3/2021 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (jm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Heather M. Collins, Anne Hunter admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Giles County Board of Education (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3324117), filed by Phillip Wright. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. Giles County Board of Education | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phillip Wright | |
| Represented By: | Heather M. Collins |
| Represented By: | Anne Hunter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Giles County Board of Education | |
| Represented By: | Donald A. Saulters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
