Tucker v. Perry et al
| Fredrick Tucker |
| Warden Grady Perry, Leigh Staggs, Emily Pugh and Stephen Kovac |
| 1:2021cv00073 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons issued as to Stephen Kovac. Service copies forwarded to USM to effect service. (ln) (Main Document 10 replaced on 1/12/2022) (ln). |
| Filing 9 Summons issued as to Emily Pugh. Service copies forwarded to USM to effect service. (ln) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Reconsider by Fredrick Tucker. (ln) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff Fredrick Tuckers Application to proceed as a pauper (Doc. No. #3 ) is GRANTED, and he is ASSESSED the $350.00 filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the South Central Correctional Facility to ensure that the custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with the portion of 28 U.S.C. 1915 pertaining to payment of the filing fee. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court concludes that Plaintiff states colorable Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Emily Pugh and Stephen Kovac. All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff two service packets (a blank summons and USM 285 form). Plaintiff MUST complete a service packet for each Defendant and return the completed service packet to the Clerk's Office within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Upon return of the completed service packets, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. No. #2 ) is DENIED without prejudice. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Grady Perry and Leigh Staggs terminated. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/3/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with two service packets. Copy of Order also mailed to the custodian of inmate trust accounts at SCCF.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/3/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ln) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included). (ln) |
| Filing 3 "IN FORMA PAUPERIS DECLARATION" filed by Fredrick Tucker. (ln) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Fredrick Tucker. (ln) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephen Kovac, Grady Perry, Emily Pugh, and Leigh Staggs filed by Fredrick Tucker. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
