Brewer v. Rowland et al
| Jeremiah D. Brewer |
| Bucky Rowland, J. Bailey, f/n/u Maddox and f/n/u Herald |
| 1:2023cv00020 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jeremiah D. Brewer. (kc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP application #2 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new, properly supported application. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank IFP application (Form AO 240). Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 4/14/2023. (xc: Order and IFP Form AO240 forwarded to Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jeremiah D. Brewer. (kc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against J. Bailey, f/n/u Herald, f/n/u Maddox, Bucky Rowland, filed by Jeremiah D. Brewer.(kc)
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
