King v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Michael King
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA-Email Notification
Case Number: 1:2023cv00065
Filed: September 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Commissioner is ORDERED to file a copy of the certified administrative record and an answer no later than 60 days after issuance of the Notice of Electronic Filing. Soc. Sec. R. 4(a). The certified administrative record may serve as the answer. The plaintiff is ORDERED to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record and an accompanying memorandum in support of the motion no later than thirty days after the certified administrative record and/or answer are filed. Soc. Sec. R. 6. The Commissioner shall file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after service of the plaintiff's motion. The plaintiff shall file any optional reply brief no later than fourteen days after service of the Commissioner's response brief. The briefs must support assertions of fact by particular administrative record citations. Soc. Sec. R. 5. In citing the administrative record, the parties shall use the Bates-stamped numbers in large black print generally located on the bottom right corner of each page and not the PageID numbers included by the Court's CM/ECF filing system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 09/27/23. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
September 26, 2023 Filing 4 ***DISREGARD***NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) Modified on 9/26/2023 (mg).
September 26, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg)
September 26, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ARISING UNDER 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (mg)
September 26, 2023 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3920437), filed by Michael King. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg)
September 26, 2023 TN State Bar status verified as active for Charles L. Holliday admitted to this court. (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael King
Represented By: Charles L. Holliday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Email Notification
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?