Tunks v. City of Cookeville et al
Jeffrey W. Tunks |
Tim Taylor, Putnam County Sheriff's Department, Cookeville Police Department, Randall Weiker, Danny L. Dyer, Mark S. Webb, Putnam County, City of Cookeville, Cooper and Shanburg and David K. Andrews |
2:2007cv00065 |
September 24, 2007 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Cookeville Office |
Putnam |
Juliet E. Griffin |
William J. Haynes |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 ORDER: Pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal 107 , Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Randall Weiker, Danny Dyer, Mark Webb, City of Cookeville, and the Cookeville Police Depmiment are DISMISSED with prejudice. Accordingly, the Defendants'motion for summary judgment 87 and motion to ascertain status 97 are DENIED as moot. The only remaining Defendants in this action are Tim Taylor and Cooper and Shanburg. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 12/8/10. (dt) |
Filing 95 ORDER denying 93 Motion to Deny the 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 11/8/10. (dt) |
Filing 72 ORDER: Status Conference is set for 8/20/2010 at 10:00 AM in Cookeville before District Judge William J. Haynes Jr. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 8/10/10. (dt) |
Filing 61 ORDER: This Motion for Summary Judgment 36 is Denied as Moot. See DE No. 46 . Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 4/7/10. (dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.