Brady et al v. LTD Parts, Incorporated et al
| Stacy Brady, Ron Brandt, Jeanette Champion, Marcia Denton, Darwin Dodson, Katherine Frasier, Ronald Holman, Harold Wayne Jackson, Arnee Milton, Donna Poling, Peggy Reeder, Diane Sawyer, Angela Sparks, Martha Sullivan, Stacy Thorne, Barbara Wilson, Tammy Wood and San Young |
| LTD Parts, Incorporated, Visteon Corporation, Centrum Equities XV, LLC, Terry Howard and Sherry Vinson |
| 2:2008cv00058 |
| June 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Labor: Other Office |
| White |
| Robert Echols |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Other Labor Litigation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the instant "Motion for Order Extending Deadlines to Depose Corporate Representative in Accordance With Court's Order and For Other Relief" 84 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows. The pa rties may have an extension of time to and including 11/20/09, in which to complete the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition with regard to matters concerning employee discipline as set forth in the Court's previous Order 83 . Pltfs may also question the R ule 30(b)(6) witness, to the same extent, concerning the disciplinary documents they have in their possession, regardless of whether Defts produced those documents or whether Pltfs obtained them from other source. The instant Motion is DENIED, howeve r, to the extent that Pltfs wish to question the Rule 30(b)(6) witness concerning "the method of investigation used to determine whether or not documented discipline existed for any workers at the company plant from 1/1/06 - 1/31/08." That topic was not a subject of the Rule 30(b)(6) notice, and Pltfs have not explained when they became aware of Defts' alleged failure to produce documents. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 11/5/09. (tmw)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER re Defts' "Renewed MOTION for Protective Order With Respect to Pltfs' Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice" 76 . For the foregoing reasons, Defts' Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED, as discussed above, with regard to Topic Nos. 8, 11, 12, 22 and the unnumbered paragraph at the end of the Notice. The Motion is granted in part and denied in part with regard to Topic No. 13. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/5/09. (tmw)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the instant Motion for Protective Order 70 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 7/22/09. (tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
