Oakley et al v. Remy International, Inc.
Douglas Oakley and Neill Rinker |
Remy International, Inc. |
2:2009cv00107 |
October 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Cookeville Office |
Overton |
Robert Echols |
E. Clifton Knowles |
Plaintiff |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum issued contemporaneously herewith, Defendant Remy International, Inc.'s "Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer for Forum Non-Conveniens" (Dock et Entry No. 15 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's request that this action be dismissed is hereby DENIED. Defendant's alternative request that this case be transferred to the Southern District of Indiana is hereby GRANTED and the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Because the Court is transferring this action, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket Entry No. 17 ) and Motion to Certify Class (Docket Entry No. 20 ) for purposes of this Courts docket. Defendant's Motion for Leave of Court to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer for Forum Non-Conveniens (Docket Entry No. 27 ) is likewise deemed MOOT. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 2/5/10. (km) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.