Rich v. Social Security Administration et al
Thomas Christopher Rich |
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification |
2:2010cv00117 |
November 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Cookeville Office |
Davidson |
Juliet E. Griffin |
John T. Nixon |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER: The Court finds the Magistrate Judge's 21 Report and Recommendation to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. The Court DENIED pltf's 13 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. This Order terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this action, and the case is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 2/13/12. (rd) |
Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that pltf's 13 MOTION for Judgment on the Administrative Record be DENIED and this action be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/23/12. (rd) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Plaintiff shall have 30 days from entry of this order to file a motion for judgment on the record and accompanying memorandum. The defendant shall, within 30 days of the filing of the plaintiff's motion, file a response. The defendant shall respond SPECIFICALLY to each issue raised by the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have 14 days from the filing of the response to file a reply if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 2/25/11. (dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.