Harden et al v. Young et al
| Robert Gwen Harden and Jessica Brown Harden |
| Ronald Lee Young, Jr. and Interstate Distributor Company |
| 2:2011cv00050 |
| May 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Cookeville Office |
| Smith |
| Joe Brown |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 9/9/2011. Discovery due by 3/9/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 4/9/2012. Case Management Telephone Conference set for 1/12/2012 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown. To partici pate in the conference call, parties shall call 615-695-2851 at the scheduled time. After consulting with Judge Sharp's courtroom deputy, this matter is set for trial on 10/2/2012 at 9:00 AM. Judge Sharp will conduct the Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/10/2012 at 1:30 PM. Judge Sharp will issue a separate order specifying his requirements for the final pretrial conference and the trial at a later date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/12/11. (dt)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management. Discovery is not stayed absent order of the District Judge.This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/9/11. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
