United States of America v. Bowden et al
| United States of America |
| Wesley D. Bowden, Betty S. Bowden, County of Cumberland, County of Bledsoe, Harry B. Doolitle and Edward A. Denison |
| 2:2012cv00012 |
| February 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Cookeville Office |
| Cumberland |
| John S. Bryant |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Foreclosure |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 66 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/28/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 82 Motion To Produce Verified Copy of Debt. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/5/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: MOTION to Continue Trial Date 49 is Granted. Bench Trial is reset for 8/13/2013 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Conference is reset for 7/22/2013 at 2:30 PM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/18/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
