Mullins v. Norris et al
| Shun Mullins |
| Lloyd Norris, City of Algood Tennessee Fire Department, Keith Morrison, Terry Foutch, Cindy Chaffin, The City of Algood, Tennessee, Putnum County Emergency Medical Services and Putnum County, Tennessee |
| 2:2014cv00045 |
| April 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Cookeville Office |
| Putnam |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion 118 insofar as it seeks summary judgment of Plaintiff's federal claims. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over P laintiff's remaining state-law claims. The Clerk shall enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/22/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Lloyd Norris's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 105 ) is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/17/2015. (hb)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/14/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
