Slone v. Bilbery et al
| Joshua Slone |
| Jewell Bilbery, Dean McBride and Oddie Shoupe |
| 2:2014cv00089 |
| September 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Cookeville Office |
| White |
| Joe Brown |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 42) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 30) is hereby GRANTED; and This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/20/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
|
|
Filing
42
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment:. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/24/2015. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 30) be granted and the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/8/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
