Venikov v. Thurman's Used Cars et al
Plaintiff: Mikhail Venikov
Defendant: Thurman's Used Cars, Robert E. Thurman, II and Robert Joshua Thurman
Case Number: 2:2017cv00030
Filed: April 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Cookeville Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: Jeffery S. Frensley
Presiding Judge: Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER: Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition because, given the strong preference for termination of cases on the merits, equitable factors exist f or setting aside any entry of default against Defendants. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 40 is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Venikov's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 25 ) is DENIED WITHOU PREJUDICE as to Thurman's Used Cars and DENIED with respect to Robert Thurman. Any default entered against Robert Thurman is hereby SET ASIDE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/6/2019. (xc:Pro se parties by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified text on 6/6/2019 (mg).
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: On the basis of the foregoing and having fully considered the arguments raised by the Defendants, the Defendants' objections are OVERRULED, and the R&R is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Defendants' Motion to Dis miss (Doc. No. 33 ) and Request for Dismissal (Doc. No. 36 ) are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/30/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 26 Report and Recommendation; and denying 28 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/18/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Venikov v. Thurman's Used Cars et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikhail Venikov
Represented By: Mark T. Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thurman's Used Cars
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert E. Thurman, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Joshua Thurman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?