Whittaker v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Whittaker v. Social Security Administration

Whittaker v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Laurie A. Whittaker
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	2:2017cv00036
Filed:	June 2, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Cookeville Office
County:	Putnam
Presiding Judge:	Alistair Newbern
Presiding Judge:	Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 31, 2018	Filing 20 ORDER: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED under the fourth s entence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a new hearing and determination consistent with the Report and Recommendation and based upon substantial evidence. This is a final order under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/31/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
May 10, 2018	Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings In a Social Security Appeal filed by Laurie A. Whittaker. For the above stated reasons, it is recommended that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative re cord (DE 15) be GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and REMANDED for a new hearing and determination consistent with this opinion. OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourte en (14) days of the date of service of this Report and Recommendation or further appeal is waived. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Poorly drafted objecti ons, general objections, or objections that require a judge's interpretation should be afforded no effect and are insufficient to preserve the right of appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/10/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 31, 2018

Filing 20 ORDER: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED under the fourth s entence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a new hearing and determination consistent with the Report and Recommendation and based upon substantial evidence. This is a final order under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/31/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

May 10, 2018

Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings In a Social Security Appeal filed by Laurie A. Whittaker. For the above stated reasons, it is recommended that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative re cord (DE 15) be GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and REMANDED for a new hearing and determination consistent with this opinion. OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourte en (14) days of the date of service of this Report and Recommendation or further appeal is waived. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Poorly drafted objecti ons, general objections, or objections that require a judge's interpretation should be afforded no effect and are insufficient to preserve the right of appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/10/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whittaker v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurie A. Whittaker
Represented By:	William M. Kaludis
Represented By:	Howard D. Olinsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?