Scurlock v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Scurlock v. Social Security Administration

Scurlock v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Kristi Leann Scurlock
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	2:2017cv00054
Filed:	September 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Cookeville Office
County:	Smith
Presiding Judge:	Barbara D. Holmes
Presiding Judge:	Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2018	Filing 19 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; the Amended Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14 ) is GRANTED; and the final decision of the Social Security Administration is REMANDED, pursua nt to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/23/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 3, 2018	Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman recommended that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record 15 be GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman on 10/3/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2018

Filing 19 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; the Amended Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14 ) is GRANTED; and the final decision of the Social Security Administration is REMANDED, pursua nt to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/23/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

October 3, 2018

Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman recommended that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record 15 be GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman on 10/3/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scurlock v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristi Leann Scurlock
Represented By:	William M. Kaludis
Represented By:	Edward A. Wicklund
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?