Wright v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Wright v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al

Wright v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al

Plaintiff:	Dustin Shane Wright
Defendant:	Fentress County, Tennessee and Charles Scott Cravens
Case Number:	2:2017cv00070
Filed:	November 10, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Cookeville Office
County:	Fentress
Presiding Judge:	Joe Brown
Presiding Judge:	Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 24, 2019	Filing 33 DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER: The Court rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; (2) Wrights Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 31 ) is GRANTED; (3) Wright is hereby AWARDED $47,500 in compensat ory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages against Cravens in his individual capacity; and (4) The claims against the remaining Defendant having previously been settled, (Doc. No. 27 ), the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case. (xc: Cravens by regular mail.) Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/23/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) Modified on 4/24/2019 (jm).
May 29, 2018	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/29/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 24, 2019

Filing 33 DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER: The Court rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; (2) Wrights Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 31 ) is GRANTED; (3) Wright is hereby AWARDED $47,500 in compensat ory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages against Cravens in his individual capacity; and (4) The claims against the remaining Defendant having previously been settled, (Doc. No. 27 ), the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case. (xc: Cravens by regular mail.) Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/23/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) Modified on 4/24/2019 (jm).

May 29, 2018

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/29/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dustin Shane Wright
Represented By:	Michael R. Giaimo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Fentress County, Tennessee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Scott Cravens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?