Fontana v. Apple, Inc. et al
||Anthony "Tony" Fontana
||Apple, Inc. and Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
||February 8, 2018
||US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
||Barbara D. Holmes
||Waverly D. Crenshaw
|Nature of Suit:
||Personal Injury- Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 3, 2018
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Motions to Dismiss filed by Apple Inc. ( 40 ) and Verizon Wireless Services LLC ( 42 ) are hereby GRANTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/3/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|March 29, 2018
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion ( 29 ) for extension of time to file a response to Defendants' motions to dismiss is GRANTED. Defendants filed a so-called consent motion ( 34 ) for extension of time to file a reply in support of their respective motions to dismiss, which is GRANTED. Defendants may file a reply by no later than April 4, 2018. Defendants filed another unopposed motion ( 35 ), this time for a stay of discovery pending the Court's decision on Defendant's motions to dis miss, which is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED as provided herein. Discovery is therefore STAYED until September 30, 2018. The initial case management conference is RESCHEDULED for Wednesday, October 24, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/29/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?