Hickey v. Social Security Administration
| Barbara Ellen Hickey |
| Social Security Administration |
| SSA-Email Notification |
| 2:2018cv00071 |
| August 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Joe Brown |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court has received a letter from the Plaintiff in this case (Docket Entry 10). The United States has just been served and has 60 days from the time of service to answer her complaint and to file the administrative record of the proceedings in the Plaintiff's case. When the record is filed, an order will be entered scheduling the duty of the Plaintiff to request a judgment on that record and for the government to respond and for the Plaintiff to file a reply. The Court will then prepare a Report and Recommendation for the resolution of the case to Chief Judge Crenshaw. Each side will have an opportunity to object to the Report. There is no hearing as such in these cases. If the Plaintiff's condition has worsened since the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in this case, the Plaintiff may well want to file a new claim as the process for her appeal in this case will take a considerable amount of time. As a general rule the decision of the ALJ is reviewed based on the evidence available to the ALJ at the time of his or her decision. The Plaintiff may want to contact the Nashville Bar Association (615-242-9272) or the Legal Aid Society (800-238-1443) to see if she can obtain legal advice or a referral to an attorney as the Court cannot give any party legal advice. (JBB) (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) Modified on 10/17/2018 (rd).
|
| Filing 10 Letter from Barbara Ellen Hickey re request of a new hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. (jm) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions, and to conduct further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/1/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon. (jm) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Attorney General/USA on 9/13/2018. (jm) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney/MDTN. (jm) Modified on 9/20/2018 (jm). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed as to Social Security Administration served on 9/11/2018. (jm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon on behalf of Social Security Administration (Maynor-Faulcon, Mercedes) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and mailed to plaintiff for service. (afs) |
| Filing 3 RECEIPT #34675051569 in the amount of $400 posted by Barbara Ellen Hickey re #1 Social Security Complaint. (afs) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 34675051569), filed by Barbara Ellen Hickey. (No signature) (afs) Modified on 8/23/2018 (afs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
