Hodgins v. Social Security Administration
Garry Wayne Hodgins |
Social Security Administration |
SSA-Email Notification |
2:2018cv00084 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Joe Brown |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is GRANTED. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case. The Clerk is therefore directed to ISSUE PROCESS to United States Attorney for this district, the Social Security Administration, and the United States Attorney General, and to SERVE the defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/3/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Garry Wayne Hodgins. (afs) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Garry Wayne Hodgins.(afs) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.