Rodgers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number: 2:2019cv00030
Filed: August 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Cookeville Office
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. No. 23 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 17 ) is GRANTED; and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), t he final decision of the of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr. on 9/8/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Rodgers's motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. No. 17 ) be GRANTED IN PART, and that this case be REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/14/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodgers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?