Purvey v. Cox et al
| Joseph Earl Purvey |
| Allen Foster, Christina Passon, Casey Cox, Department of Safety & Homeland Security and Advanced Self Strorage LLC |
| 2:2019cv00068 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file with the Court, within fourteen (14) days of receiving this Order, a revised application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs (long form). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff AO Form 239 for hisconvenience. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/17/2019. (xc: Order and blank IFP to pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jw) |
| NOTICE mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jw) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Joseph Earl Purvey. (jw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advanced Self Strorage LLC, Casey Cox, Department of Safety & Homeland Security, Allen Foster, Christina Passon, filed by Joseph Earl Purvey.(jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
