Polochak v. Dickerson
Petitioner: Kalyn Marie Polochak
Respondent: Stanley Dickerson
Case Number: 2:2020cv00049
Filed: August 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: It appears from Petitioner's application that she does not have sufficient financial resources to pay the filing fee. Therefore, Petitioner's application (Doc. Nos. #3 , #8 ) is GRANTED. For the reasons explained in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, Petitioner shall, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order, SHOW CAUSE why her petition should not be dismissed as untimely filed. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/1/2020. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/1/2020. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kalyn Marie Polochak. (dt)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter from Kalyn Polochak.(Docket sheet sent to Kayln Polochak by regular mail.) (dt)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: In order to seek pauper status, Petitioner is DIRECTED to submit the required certificate within 30 days of entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/1/2020. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas S. Bolduc on behalf of Stanley Dickerson (Bolduc, Nicholas)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kalyn Marie Polochak. (mg)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kalyn Marie Polochak. (mg)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kalyn Marie Polochak.(mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Polochak v. Dickerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kalyn Marie Polochak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stanley Dickerson
Represented By: Nicholas S. Bolduc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?