LaForce v. Settles
| Patrick Lewis LaForce |
| Darren Settles |
| 2:2020cv00072 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Petition is untimely under the applicable one-year statute of limitations, and the Court finds that Petitioner is not entitled to equitable tolling or other relief. Accordingly, the Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED as time-barred. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/16/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Patrick Lewis LaForce. (am) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Based upon the allegations made to this point, it appears that Petitioner's Section 2254 Petition is untimely. Out of an abundance of caution, the Court will give Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, an additional opportunity to justify the timeliness of the Petition. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be dismissed as untimely. If Petitioner claims he is entitled to equitable tolling or other relief from the statute of limitations, he must provide specific information and reasons, not a general statement. Petitioner's response, or a written motion for an extension of time, must be received in writing by the Court within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Petitioner is warned that the Court may dismiss the Petition without further order if the Petitioner does not respond to this Order, or request an extension or time to respond, by the deadline. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/9/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael Matthew Stahl admitted to this court. (am) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Matthew Stahl on behalf of Darren Settles (Stahl, Michael) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am) |
| Filing 3 RECEIPT #34675060503 in the amount of $5.00 posted by Patrick Lewis LaForce re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Patrick Lewis LaForce.(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LaForce v. Settles | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Patrick Lewis LaForce | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Darren Settles | |
| Represented By: | Michael Matthew Stahl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
