Murray v. Randolph et al
Stephen R. Murray |
Bill Randolph, Larry Bates, Andrew Phillips, Mike Phillips and J.J. Reels |
2:2022cv00015 |
May 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Alistair Newbern |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stephen R. Murray re #1 440 Violation of Civil Rights (bs) |
Filing 3 ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/24/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (bs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry Bates, Andrew Phillips, Mike Phillips, Bill Randolph, J.J. Reels (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 34675066001), filed by Stephen R. Murray. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Receipt)(bs) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (bs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.