Andrews v. Evolve 7 Inc. et al
| Samuel Brady Andrews |
| Evolve 7 Inc., Evolve 11 Inc., Jigar "Jay" Patel, Dhruv "Drew" Patel, Nirav "Nick" B. Patel and TJ Patel |
| 2:2022cv00019 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: Plaintiff Samuel Andrews has moved to continue the initial case management conference set on July 28, 2022, and for a ninety-day extension of the time in which to serve the defendants in this action. (Doc. No. #13 .) The motion is GRANTED. The initial case management conference is reset to October 28, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel for each party shall call (888) 557-8511 and enter access code 7819165# to participate. The service period is extended by ninety days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 7/19/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Reset Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is reset for 10/28/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (mg) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference and for an Extension of Time in which to Serve the Defendants (if necessary) by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to TJ Patel on 06/30/2022 by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Evolve 7, Inc. (Nick Patel) on 06/30/2022 by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Nirav B. "Nick" Patel on 06/30/2022 by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Jigar "Jay" Patel on 06/30/2022 by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Evolve 11, Inc. (Gayatriben Patel) on 06/30/2022 by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Dhruv "Drew" Patel on 06/30/2022 by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Giaimo, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/1/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 7/28/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (ln) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Evolve 11 Inc., Evolve 7 Inc., Dhruv "Drew" Patel, Jigar "Jay" Patel, Nirav "Nick" B. Patel, TJ Patel. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (ln) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ln) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ln) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael R. Giaimo admitted to this court. (ln) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Evolve 11 Inc., Evolve 7 Inc., Dhruv "Drew" Patel, Jigar "Jay" Patel, Nirav "Nick" B. Patel, TJ Patel (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3603951) filed by Samuel Brady Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet)(ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
