Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Cookeville, Tennessee
| Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. |
| City of Cookeville, Tennessee doing business as Cookeville Water and Sewer Department |
| 2:2022cv00044 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Martin Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Martin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER: Counsel for the parties appeared for a telephonic initial case management conference with the Magistrate Judge on November 14, 2022. Counsel addressed the projected scope of discovery and the pending motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To accommodate briefing of the motion to dismiss, the initial case management conference is CONTINUED to January 26, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall call (888) 557-8511 and enter access code 7819165# to participate. By January 25, 2023, the parties shall file a joint amended proposed initial case management order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/15/2022. (mg)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern: Case Management Conference by Telephone held on 11/14/2022. (Hearing lasted 00:11)(sd)
|
|
Filing 17
PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.. (Martin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER: On November 7, 2022, Defendant City of Cookeville, Tennessee, filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. #13 .) Under Local Rule 7.01(a)(3), any response in opposition must be filed within fourteen days of service of the motion. An optional reply may be filed within seven days of service of a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/8/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM in Support of #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by City of Cookeville, Tennessee . (Grooms, Garry)
|
|
Filing 14
DECLARATION of Barry Turner filed by City of Cookeville, Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Consent Decree, #3 Exhibit TDEC Screenshot)(Grooms, Garry)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by City of Cookeville, Tennessee. (Grooms, Garry)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Garry K. Grooms on behalf of City of Cookeville, Tennessee (Grooms, Garry)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for William L. Penny admitted to this court. (ad)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by William L. Penny on behalf of All Defendants (Penny, William)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motion for Mark E. Martin to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. Signed by Lynda Hill, Clerk of Court, on 09/29/2022. (lh)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Supplement #8 MOTION for attorney Mark E. Martin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-3675256) by Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.. (Martin, Mark)
|
|
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#8 : The pending pro hac vice motion does not comply with the Court's local rules, because the motion fails to state whether disciplinary proceedings by any disciplinary authority, a finding of contempt or a sanction under 28 U.S.C. 1927 by any court, or criminal charges have been instituted against the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission. Local Rule 83.01(b)(2). By no later than five (5) business days from the date of this docket annotation, the pro hac vice motion must be supplemented by the filing of a statement under oath of the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission disclosing such matters. Failure to do so will result in denial of the pro hac vice motion. (mg)
|
|
AL State Bar status verified as active for Mark E. Martin not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (mg)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for attorney Mark E. Martin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-3675256) by Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.. (Martin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/26/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 11/14/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (hb)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons issued as to City of Cookeville, Tennessee. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (hb)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (hb)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (hb)
|
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Elizabeth A. Alexander admitted to this court. (hb)
|
|
AL State Bar status verified as active for Mark E. Martin not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (hb)
|
|
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Mark E. Martin: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 10/17/2022. (hb)
|
|
Filing 2
BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (hb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Cookeville, Tennessee (Filing fee $402, Receipt number ATNMDC-3672854), filed by Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Appendix A, #3 Exhibit 1 - May Notice, #4 Exhibit 2 - Tobey Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 - Redwine Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 - Noel Declaration, #7 Exhibit 5 - Jonakin Declaration)(hb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Cookeville, Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth A. Alexander |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Cookeville, Tennessee doing business as Cookeville Water and Sewer Department | |
| Represented By: | Garry K. Grooms |
| Represented By: | William L. Penny |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
