Ashley et al v. Jones et al
| Katherine Ann Ashley, Katelyn Phillips, Deannia Keith and Savannah Smith |
| Coltan Jones, Sheriff Michael Reagon and Fentress County |
| 2:2024cv00011 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Disclosure of Intimate Images |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Arthur F. Knight, III admitted to this court. (kc) |
Filing 13
ORDER: Defendant Coltan Jones has filed a motion to reset the April 29, 2024 initial case management conference and to extend the deadline for him to answer Plaintiffs' complaint to May 7, 2024. (Doc. No. #12 .) Taking the motion's caption at its word, the Court GRANTS Jones's motion as unopposed. The April 29, 2024 initial case management conference is RESET on May 20, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 4/18/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Reset Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 5/20/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (mg) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and to continue case management conference by Coltan Jones. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Arthur F. Knight, III)(Knight, Arthur) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur F. Knight, III on behalf of Coltan Jones (Knight, Arthur) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Katherine Ann Ashley (Brazil, Frank) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Robyn Beale Williams, William Hamner Leslie admitted to this court. (kc) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Fentress County, Michael Reagon.(Williams, Robyn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William Hamner Leslie on behalf of Fentress County, Michael Reagon (Leslie, William) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robyn Beale Williams on behalf of Fentress County, Michael Reagon (Williams, Robyn) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/27/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 4/29/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (af) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Fentress County, Coltan Jones, Michael Reagon. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (af) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (af) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (af) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fentress County, Coltan Jones, Michael Reagon (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4020830), filed by Katherine Ann Ashley, Deannia Keith, Katelyn Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(af) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Wesley B. Clark, Frank Ross Brazil, Paul D. Randolph, III admitted to this court. (af) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
