Kremer v. Webador.com et al
| Maxwell Kremer |
| Webador.com and Stripe.com |
| 2:2024cv00028 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Antitrust |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (am) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (am) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Malcolm B. Futhey, III on behalf of Stripe.com (am) |
| Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Stripe.com. (am) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stripe.com from Circuit Court of Overton County, case number 2023-cv-50. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BTNMDC-4056098) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - A State Court Pleadings, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(am) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Malcolm B. Futhey, III admitted to this court. (am) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
