USA v. Twenty-eight firearm, et al
| 3:2002cv00666 |
| July 16, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other Office |
| Joe Brown |
| Robert Echols |
| Defendant |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 18:0922 Firearms |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE: A Judgment by Default is entered as to Larry D. Gilliland, Jo Ann Gilliland, RSR Group, Inc., Chris Fish, Jonathan Fish and all other persons or entities with respect to any interest they may have in th e deft property. The deft property described in this order is forfeited to the United States of America, and all right, title and interest in and to said property is hereby vested in the United States of America. U.S. Marshals Service and/or the Bure au of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, as custodian of said forfeited property, shall dispose of the same according to law. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 10/31/08. (cc: cert copy to US Attorney's Office)(cc: Johnathan Fish, Chris Fish, Peter Strianse for Jo Ann Gilliland, Richard Blews for RSR Group, Inc.)(km)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. Twenty-eight firearm, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
