Settle v. Bell et al
Plaintiff: Mike Settle
Defendant: Ricky Bell and Sandy Hall
Case Number: 3:2007cv00401
Filed: April 12, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER: The Court adopts the 150 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly 129 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Fred Schildkamp is GRANTED and all claims against Defendant Schildkamp are DISMISSED. There being no claims remaining in this action, the pretrial conference set for June 29, 2009,and the jury trial set for July 14, 2009, are canceled. The Clerk is directed to close this file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 03/19/09. (xc: Pltf by reg. and cert. mail)(ab)
October 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ****DISREAGRD ENTRY, ENTERED IN WRONG CASE***ORDER : The Court has reviewed the 41 Report and Recommendation, the 43 Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approve d. Accordingly, Defendants 32 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The jury trial set for November 18, 2008, and the pretrial conference set for November 10, 2008, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/15/08. (xc: Pltf by reg. and cert. mail)(ab) Modified text on 10/15/2008 (ab).
October 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER: The Court has reviewed the 103 Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Pltf's 73 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/08/08. (xc: Pltf by reg. and cert. mail)(ab)
September 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER: The 93 Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, that portion of Defendants 66 Motion to Dismiss which seeksdismissal of Plaintiffs retaliation claim is DENIED. All other pending Motions are referred to the Magistrate Judge for decision or recommendation as to disposition. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 09/08/08. (xc: Pltf by reg. and cert. mail)(ab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Settle v. Bell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricky Bell
Represented By: Pamela S. Lorch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandy Hall
Represented By: Pamela S. Lorch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike Settle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?