Birdwell et al v. Corso et al
| Michael Birdwell and Jennifer Birdwell |
| City of Ridgetop, Tennessee and Timothy Corso |
| 3:2007cv00629 |
| June 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Robertson |
| Robert Echols |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Therefore, City of Ridgetop's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 195 is GRANTED IN PART. All state law claims against Ridgetop (and Corso in his official capacity) and the state law neg ligence claims against Corso in his individual capacity are STRICKEN from the Second Amended Complaint. The bases for the Section 1983 claims are clarified as stated in this Order. It is so ordered. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/15/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw) Modified text on 11/15/2010 (tmw).
|
|
Filing
188
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In light of all of this, the court concludes that Mays's testimony would not be sufficiently reliable, would not assist the trier of fact, and should be excluded. The plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony o f Defendant City of Ridgetop's Proffered Expert Dennis Mays 176 is GRANTED, and Dennis Mays is excluded from testifying for Ridgetop at the trial of this matter. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/25/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
